I have used both methods and I have found that both have their place…but having said this I cannot replicate the results I get with Photomatix using ACR.This is not just a fanboy comment but one based on using both methods for the same image many times in practice.What I have found is that Photomatix gets a bad rap because it gets used with a heavy handed approach. So it’s probably not too far off before we start seeing 32 bit plug-ins as well.) Reply (I remember only three or four years ago that many of the current plugins were finally upgraded to work in 16 bit mode. About half the adjustments are able to work in 32 bit mode. I’m pretty sure they will be upgraded to 32 bit in the not too distant future. After taking the 32bit image into PS, after finishing ACR, have you considered staying in 32 bit for other things like sharpening and using luminosity and color grade masking? The main downside for me to that is that curves adjustments are still limited to 16 bit. But then, Olympus is known for having a tone of info in the highlights vs other RAW files. I had done some comparison in the past between PS and Photomatix on the Olympus RAW files and preferred the PS. I expect some of the experiences we each have are varied a bit by the sensor and how PS handles that particular RAW file(s). I’ve used this method for awhile, and there is a detailed article explaining 32 bit truths and myths here: that has been very useful for me. More images using this approach and the Digital and Color Zone Systems Like the style of this tutorial? You will LOVE HDR Insider! Full-Length HDR Workflows, Critiques & More! Please feel free to leave your thoughts in the comments section below! I encourage you to experiment with this method and see what you think. Especially in highlight detail areas.Įdited using the 32 bit Photomatix approach and the Digital and Color Zone Systems. The overall finished product seemed more refined than the Photoshop Merge to HDR Pro.Compared to a noisy tone mapped photograph. This is highlighted in the video tutorial below. The Photomatix versions appeared to have less blown highlights in tricky areas.Photomatix’s Algorithm for correcting ghosting is far superior to Photoshop and grants the user more control.Here were some of the blatant advantages: I compared and contrasted several Photomatix Pro 32 bit images with Photoshop’s Merge to HDR Pro. While the Merge To HDR Pro in Photoshop method is great, there is a healthy alternative. This is a very common method for making realistic HDR images that do not leave you with that dirty Grungy tone mapped look from Photomatix.Īs HDR advances this method has been gaining much more popularity, especially with the newer RAW files a s a base that provide a stellar amount of dynamic range. It allows for 32 bit tone mapping using the absolute power of ACR (in Photoshop CC). If you have spent anytime experimenting with HDR you have probably heard about Photoshop’s Merge to HDR Pro. However, for your facilitation, it contains a user guide and answers to some of the possible questions that might come up in your mind while using this application.Yes, 32 bit processing with Photomatix and ACR is possible! One of its limitations is that it requires excessive computer resources, so you might not be able to use other applications when using it. You can choose the relevant settings from the options that are available to you. Furthermore, the application also provides you with simple editing options like cropping, resizing, and rotating. The best part of this application is that you can use Photomatix for single-picture editing or bulk-picture editing. Similarly, you can adjust the lighting elements of an image or settle the level of details and layers in a picture. Moreover, you can adjust the saturation level, the color’s strength, contrast, detail, and other editing elements that can give a different look to the existing image. By using them, either you can enhance the overall outlook of your application, or you can lower it, depending on your needs and priorities. Otherwise, you can import them through the browsing option that the application provides to the users.Įnhancer and compressor are the two main options you would look for on this application. However, it has the drag-and-drop feature enabled, so you can use this method to bring your files to the application. Although some tools are available conveniently, they lack a modern look. When considering the interface of the application, you’ll find it simplistic. Photomatix can provide a simple to complex retouching process within a few minutes.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |